I'm evaluating ways to use MS DFS-R and add remote file-locking through PeerLock.
I have a few technical questions and hope they can be answered here.
We have two servers that replicate using MS DFS-R as included in Server 2003 R2 and those servers have finished initial replication. When a file is now opened on Server A, the lock is put on the same file on Server B. When the modified file is closed on Server A and DFS-R starts to replicate the changes to the file this may take quite a while depending on the network bandwidth.
Doesn't the fact the PeerLock removes the lock on the file on Server B cause this server to initiate a replication back to Server A which might interfere with the already pending replication from Server A to Server?
In my testlab I added a large amount of data to Server A and replication started (some empty folders started to appear on Server
I'm wondering if that may have been caused by PeerLock.
Is there a recommendation to disable it for large structures that have not completely replicated yet? Or should I stop users from accessing folder structures where replication has not been completed yet?
It would be great if you could provide some insight into this, as I really believe PeerLock could be great tool for a lot of our customers.
Thank you
Chris

Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote


